P&T Science | Rainforest Alliance, Organic and Fairtrade: What Certifications Really Mean in the Tea Market

Around 13 million people work in the tea sector worldwide. Labels such as Fairtrade and Rainforest Alliance have become a central tool over recent decades for establishing minimum social and environmental standards in global supply chains — in areas where government regulation alone falls short. But how exactly do these systems work, what have they achieved, and what does it mean when a tea carries no certification at all? This article offers a data-driven overview and explains how we at P&T approach the subject.

The Bigger Picture: Tea as a Global Mass-Market Product with Social Challenges

Tea is the most widely consumed drink in the world after water. The global tea market has surpassed annual revenues of over 17 billion US dollars, with the traded share standing at around 9.5 billion US dollars.[1] Behind these figures are 13 million people, approximately nine million of whom are smallholder farmers in developing countries — they produce around 60% of the world's tea.[1]

Despite growing global demand, the economic reality for many of these people is one of income poverty. Wages on tea plantations in many regions fall below estimates for a living wage.[2] For plantation workers in Assam, northern India, the documented gap between actual wages and a calculated living wage stands at around 81%; in Kenya, it is 62%.[3] These figures illustrate why independent certification systems have emerged as one tool that can help improve conditions — even if they cannot provide a complete solution on their own.

The causes of income poverty in the tea sector are structural: global price pressure, opaque auction systems, the weak bargaining position of smallholder farmers, and in some regions inadequate government minimum wage regulation. Certification systems respond to this complex environment as a market-based instrument — with measurable impact in some areas and clear limitations in others.

What Are Voluntary Sustainability Standards?

Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS) are private-sector frameworks that commit producers, processors and traders to minimum social, environmental or economic requirements. Compliance is verified by independent third parties; businesses that meet the standards are permitted to use the relevant label on their products.

Three standards have established themselves as particularly significant for the European tea market: organic/eco certification, Fairtrade International and Rainforest Alliance (which merged with UTZ in 2018). They differ in their focus: organic addresses ecological farming, Fairtrade primarily social and economic justice, and Rainforest Alliance a combination of both.

An important point: certifications are always market-oriented. Around 80% of Rainforest Alliance-certified tea goes to the EU — demand for labels arises where consumers actively call for them.[4] Growth in recent years has been remarkable: between 2008 and 2019, the volume of VSS-compliant tea production grew at an average annual rate of around 30%. By 2019, certified tea production accounted for at least a quarter of global output.[4]

Organic Certification: Ecological Farming as a Legal Standard

Organic certification differs fundamentally from Fairtrade and Rainforest Alliance: it is not a private-sector standard, but a legally binding framework. In the European Union, the legal basis is the EU Organic Regulation (2018/848); comparable national legislation exists in the US (USDA Organic), Japan (JAS) and other countries.[5]

The core requirements relate exclusively to ecological production: no use of mineral fertilisers, no use of chemically synthesised pesticides, a ban on genetic engineering, and annual inspection by accredited bodies. Social aspects such as wages or working conditions play no role in organic certification — a fundamental difference from Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance.

Beyond the EU Organic Regulation, farming associations such as Demeter, Naturland and Bioland build on this legal framework and set more stringent requirements. In Germany, organic tea's share of the overall food market recently stood at around 15% — a comparatively high figure.[6]

Fairtrade International: Price as a Protective Instrument

How Fairtrade Works

The Fairtrade system is built on two core economic mechanisms:

Fairtrade Minimum Price: For certified products, Fairtrade International sets a minimum price to be paid to the producing organisation. This minimum price acts as a safety net — buying companies must pay at least this price, or the market price if it is higher. The aim is to protect producers from the effects of sharp price fluctuations, which can otherwise threaten their livelihoods.[7]

Fairtrade Premium: In addition to the product price, producer organisations receive a ring-fenced premium. This is allocated democratically — within the producer community — for investment in schools, healthcare facilities, infrastructure or agricultural improvements. This mechanism demonstrably strengthens the agency of communities.[7]

Social Requirements

Alongside the pricing mechanism, the Fairtrade standard requires compliance with working conditions that go beyond legal minimums: a prohibition on child and forced labour, safe working conditions, the right to trade union membership and collective bargaining, and minimum requirements for accommodation and sanitation for plantation workers. Compliance is audited annually by accredited bodies.[7]

Fairtrade International is a member of the Global Living Wage Coalition and is developing region-specific living wage benchmarks for key tea-growing regions including Kenya, India, Sri Lanka and Malawi. The system requires certified plantations to make continuous, measurable progress towards a living wage.[2]

Rainforest Alliance (incl. UTZ): Capacity Building as an Approach

The 2018 Merger

In January 2018, Rainforest Alliance and UTZ Certified merged into a single organisation.[8] Both had shared goals — promoting more sustainable agriculture in areas such as climate change, deforestation, biodiversity and social justice — and together operated certification programmes in more than 130 countries. Since 2020, a unified programme has been running under the new Sustainable Agriculture Standard (SAS).[9]

How Rainforest Alliance Works

The standard takes a systemic approach: it does not set fixed prices, but since 2020 has required buying companies to pay a mandatory Sustainability Differential above the market price — as compensation for the additional effort involved in certified production. Buyers must also cover the cost of certification for farms.[10]

The standard focuses on four key areas: climate resilience and climate-smart agriculture, biodiversity protection, human rights and working conditions, and supply chain transparency. Certified operations must be audited annually and are required to measure and document indicators such as the use of shade trees, fertiliser application and water consumption.[11]

An independent study of the Kenyan tea sector commissioned by Rainforest Alliance in 2022 (carried out by Ergon Associates) identified ongoing challenges around wages and worker representation — demonstrating that Rainforest Alliance actively acknowledges problem areas within its own system and actively seeks external scrutiny.[12]

What Does Independent Research Show?

The academic literature on the impact of sustainability certifications in the tea sector points to measurable positive effects, which nonetheless vary by region and context.

Price Impact: Demonstrable, but Context-Dependent

The IISD's 2024 global market report, drawing on auction data from Mombasa, Colombo and Kolkata (2020–2022), found that in Kenya, producers with combined Fairtrade and organic certification were able to achieve prices up to 23% above the average auction price.[13] The impact varies considerably by region — in Sri Lanka and India, average auction prices during the same period were at a comparable or higher level, which puts the price advantage of certification in those markets into perspective.[13]

Wage Impact: Positive Effects, Structural Limits

An impact study commissioned by Fairtrade International (Siegmann et al., 2019) found that certified operations offered measurably better non-monetary benefits — for example, access to education and community infrastructure through the premium.[15] The measurable impact on directly paid wages is more limited, as wages in many countries are regulated by government collective bargaining processes that certification systems alone cannot directly influence. The Institute of Development Studies (IDS) noted in 2024 that structural wage improvements require the coordinated efforts of standards bodies, purchasing companies, government policy and worker representation — no single instrument can tackle this complex challenge alone.[16]

What the Premium Achieves

A consistent and positive finding in the research concerns the Fairtrade premium: studies show that its use for community projects has brought measurable improvements in education, healthcare and infrastructure — particularly in well-organised smallholder cooperatives. The stronger the structural organisation of producer groups, the more effectively the premium delivers results.[15]

The Certification Gap: A Structural Market Problem

An important factor in assessing certifications is the so-called certification gap: the discrepancy between the volume of tea produced to certified standards and the volume that is actually sold as certified.

The IISD's 2024 report finds that VSS-compliant tea is sold as conventional tea in a significant proportion of cases — without any premium reaching producers, even though they have already borne the costs of certification.[13] The cause is a structural imbalance between the growth of certified production and consumer-side demand for certified products. A further factor is the auction infrastructure: since a large share of the world's tea is traded through auctions, certified tea is sometimes initially declared as conventional — a problem the industry refers to as "retro-certification".[14]

This underlines a key point: the effectiveness of certifications depends not only on the standards themselves, but also on companies actively seeking out certified volumes and embedding that commitment in their purchasing strategy.

No Label = No Standards? An Important Distinction

A widespread misconception is the assumption that "uncertified" equals "unsustainable". This is an oversimplification.

Certifications are verifications by external institutions: an independent body confirms that defined standards are being met. This is a genuine asset — particularly in complex, multi-tiered supply chains where direct verification is not practicable for buying companies. The value of a label lies above all in its function as an objectively verifiable signal that provides guidance to both companies and consumers.

At the same time, there are structural reasons why farms may not be certified despite practising sustainable cultivation. Certifications cost money and time — an organic, Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance licence means annual costs and administrative burden for producers. For a small tea plantation in the mountains of Vietnam or Taiwan, producing exclusively for local or direct export markets, this effort is often neither economically viable nor culturally embedded. It is not uncommon for such farms to grow without pesticides or mineral fertilisers — in practice following organic principles — without ever seeking formal certification.

Equally, there are companies and projects that pay fair wages and operate transparently without carrying any label.

The key point is this: the absence of a label says nothing about actual growing or working conditions. It simply means that no independent third party has formally verified them.

P&T and Our Approach

At P&T, we are organically certified (DE-ÖKO-070). This is a deliberate choice: organic is, for us, the most relevant standard in the context of our range and our purchasing strategy — and the only one for which the availability of certified teas on the market is sufficient to genuinely cover our assortment.

Fairtrade and Rainforest Alliance are not certifications we hold ourselves. Fairtrade-certified tea accounts for an estimated 1–3% of the German market.[6] This means that a broad range like ours cannot, structurally, be built on Fairtrade alone — this is not a rejection of the standard, but a question of market structure.

A significant share of our tea is sourced directly from tea gardens and cooperatives whose growing and working conditions we know through longstanding partnerships. In such cases — for example with speciality teas from small mountain regions — direct transparency of origin takes precedence: we know who grows the tea, how it is produced and what projects are being supported on the ground. As a member of the German Tea Association, we have also committed to the ILO core labour standards.

We want to be transparent: no approach is complete. Certifications are an important tool — and we support their continued development. Our aim is to contribute to improving conditions in the tea sector through sound knowledge, selective purchasing decisions and open communication.

Summary

Organic, Fairtrade and Rainforest Alliance each take distinct, partially complementary approaches: organic addresses ecological farming as a legal standard, Fairtrade relies on price mechanisms and premiums as direct income protection, and Rainforest Alliance focuses on systemic requirements and capacity building. All three have demonstrably achieved positive outcomes — yet structural challenges such as wage levels and market power dynamics lie beyond the reach of any one instrument alone.

It is also worth noting: the absence of a label does not automatically mean that tea has been produced under problematic conditions. Many small tea operations work sustainably and fairly without having the resources for formal certification. Transparency about origin and supply relationships is therefore just as relevant as the presence of a label.

This article reflects the scientific and regulatory position as of April 2026.

References

All cited sources are drawn from peer-reviewed studies, official reports from international organisations, or from the certification organisations themselves.

1. Voora, V. et al. (2024): Global Market Report: Tea – Prices and Sustainability. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). iisd.org/publications/report/2024-global-market-report-tea
2. Fairtrade International (2024): Tea – Risk Map. riskmap.fairtrade.net/commodities/tea
3. Fairtrade International (2022): Living Wage – Fairtrade Risk Map. riskmap.fairtrade.net/salient-issues/living-wage
4. IISD / State of Sustainability Initiatives (2024): Tea Coverage. iisd.org/ssi/commodities/tea-coverage
5. European Parliament & Council of the EU (2018): Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production. eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/848/oj
6. German Tea Association (2023/2024): Tea Market Data Germany. (Internal association statistics, cited from expert communication.)
7. Ethical Consumer (2025): Tea and Coffee Certification Schemes. ethicalconsumer.org/food-drink/tea-coffee-certification-schemes
8. Rainforest Alliance (2018): UTZ and Rainforest Alliance merge. rainforest-alliance.org/utz/
9. Rainforest Alliance (2023): Our Certification Program in 2023. rainforest-alliance.org/business/certification
10. Rainforest Alliance (2022): Rainforest Alliance Certified Tea: Creating a Sustainable Tea Sector. rainforest-alliance.org/insights/rainforest-alliance-certified-tea
11. Rainforest Alliance (2020): The Rainforest Alliance Announces Its Enhanced Certification Program and Standard. rainforest-alliance.org/press-releases
12. Rainforest Alliance / Ergon Associates (2022): Independent Study: Kenya Tea Sector. rainforest-alliance.org/business/certification/kenya-tea-sector-independent-study/
13. Tea & Coffee Trade Journal (2024): Do tea farmers benefit from sustainable certification schemes? With reference to: Voora, V. et al. (2024), IISD. teaandcoffee.net/blog/33616
14. FAO Intergovernmental Group on Tea (2018): Fostering Sustainability in Tea Production and Trade. openknowledge.fao.org
15. Siegmann, K. et al. (2019): Fairtrade Certified Tea in the Hired Labour Sector in India and Sri Lanka. Fairtrade International / Max Havelaar France. fairtrade.net
16. Institute of Development Studies (2024): We need a new approach to achieve a decent living for plantation workers. ids.ac.uk

Updated: 14 March 2026 · Based on in-depth research and an extensive conversation with our internal quality assurance team.

Licence & Use

Content on this page is published under CC BY 4.0. Please credit the source as P&T – Packaging & Sustainability and link to this article when reproducing the content.